Nancy Pelosi Defends Conyers on Sexual Harassment Charges

I am often asked why I am running for Congress against an entrenched incumbent.  Today, on Meet The Press (NBC), my opponent provided a loud and clear answer to that important question.

When asked by NBC’s Chuck Todd about the accusations against Congressman John Conyers, Ms. Pelosi’s first response was characteristically off topic and irrelevant to the question: “We are strengthened by due process.”  (What is that supposed to mean?)  She then dismissed the gravity and seriousness of the allegations against Conyers by saying, “Was it one accusation?  Was it two?” suggesting small numbers of accusations carry no weight.  When asked if she believes Conyers’ accusers, she refused to answer and performed a pivot worthy of Stefan Curry, “That’s for the Ethics Committee to determine.”  Finally, she praises Conyers’ work in Congress and declares him to be “a national icon.”

My opponent’s defense of Conyers is indefensible.  As a lawyer who has represented hundreds of victims of every kind and degree of sexual harassment in the workplace – from hostile environments, snide comments, to quid pro quo sexual propositions, to unwanted touching or groping, to retaliation for refusal to submit to sexual demands, to being drugged, raped and thrown out onto the street by a male supervisor – the Congressperson’s comments are disgraceful to the extreme and contradict core values of the Democratic Party.

Moreover, her attempt to plainly condemn all sexual harassment of anyone (female, male, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender) is a transparent abrogation of her moral duty to lead the Democratic Party and to speak loudly for the people of San Francisco who elect her. Some issues transcend politics; this is one of them. The public has an absolute right to any time public funds are expended to settle civil claims of sexual harassment of as public official.  Using taxpayer money to pay off victims of sexual harassment to buying their silence with non-disclosure agreements is reprehensible and must be stopped now. Donate (donate.jaffe4congress.com) and volunteer (jaffe4congress.com/volunteer)

Together, we can give San Francisco the voice it deserves but does not now have in Congress.  Join me to make history and change the future.


We Must Do Better by Our Veterans

Like many Americans, Veteran’s Day has a personal meaning to me.  As a young medical doctor, my father, Louis Jaffe, MD, served in the Army during World War II.  He was a first-born-generation American.  All four of my grandparents were from Russia and Poland. As a Jew, he joined to fight Hitler and the Nazis.

After he joined, he was trained in tropical medicine; he expected to be sent somewhere in the Pacific in the war against the Japanese.  However, using logic only the Army understood, he was then stationed on one of the Aleutian Islands in Alaska.  He stayed there until 1944 when, with no explanation, he was summoned to a small town in Tennessee.  The town was Oak Ridge, one of the two locations of the Manhattan Project. (The other location was Los Alamos, New Mexico).  My Dad worked there until 1946 and temporarily became one of the world’s leading experts on the effects of radiation on humans.  I am proud of my father and his extraordinary service to our country.

When I was of the age when military service was possible for me, the Vietnam war was raging and reaching its peak. There was tremendous social and political pressure to resist the war and to resist voluntarily going into the military.  As it turned out, although I was classified I-A (eligible to be drafted), I was medically disqualified from serving. I never had to face being drafted, refusing to be inducted or fleeing to Canada.  So, I never served in military, something I have come to regret.

When I was a child, I remember the way the military was publicly perceived.  Soldiers were heroes.  Men returning from war in Europe, the Pacific or Korea were welcomed warmly.  But things changed with Vietnam. The country’s outrage against the immoral and unnecessary war was wrongly focused on the rank-and-file soldiers who had nothing to do with the political and military decisions which put them in harm’s way.  That fault lay with the Johnson and Nixon administrations.  The soldiers returning from Vietnam were no longer heroes to many; they were cruelly and unjustly taunted as murderers and baby killers.

This was not a good time to be a veteran.  Some good films were made about what it was like to be a Vietnam veteran those days: “Coming Home” and “Born On the Fourth of July” are two of them.

Veterans since Vietnam have had a raw deal from the government.  The VA has been scandalously and negligently understaffed and equipped to do its job, causing the deaths of vets waiting for appointments.   Chest-pounding self-declared Republican “patriots” regularly and hypocritically cut back veterans’ benefits.  And perhaps most importantly, presidents of both parties have sent our men and women into unnecessary and prolonged wars, causing the avoidable deaths and physical destruction of those who serve.  A disgraceful portion of the homeless and mentally ill in the US are military veterans whom we have all let down.

Was Vietnam necessary?  Apparently not, because Vietnam is now the single reunited nation 58,220 Americans died to prevent existing – and that nation shows no intention of attacking or harming us. Was Iraq necessary?  Obviously not.  It was based on a Bush administration lie – the weapons of mass destruction ruse.  Afghanistan?  It was started to wipe out Al Qaeda  and “get” Bin Laden.  But Al Qaeda has been replaced by ISIS and Bin Laden is dead.

Now, the Korean Peninsula is poised to become the latest battlefield.  This policy of the US being in a perpetual state of war must end.  My platform advocates no more such foreign military interventions. The US economy is a war-based economy addicted to ongoing war; it must be turned away from conflict and towards peace. The obscene $700+ billion military budget must be drastically cut and those freed-up funds used to solve the health, education, infrastructure and other urgent problems already existing.

I advocate the full and immediate repair and revitalization of the VA so the men and women who serve in the military are treated with the respect and with the dignity they have earned and deserve.  I am proud to have earned the amazing endorsement of the National Veterans For Bernie organization.  http://vetsforbernie.org/veterans-f... Join me and them to bringing about the changes which are desperately needed for our veterans and for all of us in the future.  -- Stephen


The Better Deal is a Bad Deal

In 1984 a national fast food chain ran a TV commercial.  A cranky elderly woman (Clara Peller) was served a hamburger.  She looked inside and sees the hamburger patty is tiny.  The customer then utters words that have become immortal. “Where’s the beef?”  Both the commercial and Peller became instantly famous.

In the years since, the phrase “Where’s the beef?” entered the English vernacular and has come to mean questioning the substance of any statement.  I say, “Where’s the beef?”  in response to Nancy Pelosi’s positions on critical issues facing San Francisco voters (which she calls “A Better Deal”),  Her statements are evasive, equivocal statements - gibberish word salads.  Her positions are vague and obtuse; understanding them is like trying to grasp a cloud.  It appears the words, “Yes,” and “No,” are not in Ms.Pelosi’s verbal repetoir.   A recent article about Ms. Pelosi says, “The details of A Better Deal are hazy...”  a colossal understatement.

The central theme of Ms. Pelosi’s Better Deal is to agree with the Republican’s proposed tax cuts for the rich.  Yes, you read that correctly.  Instead of opposing tax cuts for the 1% which will enlarge the huge gap between them and the rest of us, the Democratic Leader of the House of Representatives agrees with them: “Pelosi is saying the right things at the moment to sound bipartisan, indicating she could get on board with Republican-proposed tax cuts under the right circumstances.”  says the Denver Post.

I urge the voters of San Francisco - especially those who may feel inclined to vote for Ms. Pelosi out of habit or the belief she represents their interests - to closely examine her record in Congress.  Not what she says, but what she does.  You will find she is aligned with corporate and establishment interests and values in complete conflict with those of a vast majority of the people of San Francisco, whom she was elected to represent.

The Denver Post article also reports: “Pelosi said members of the anti-fascist movement — known as Antifa — are not Democrats, but are largely socialists and Marxists, and that their violence at rallies in California was unacceptable.”  That statement is both palpably  false and insulting to the hundreds of millions of Americans who oppose fascism, especially those San Franciscans who recently peacefully marched against the white supremacists and fascists in our City.  Ms. Pelosi absurdly says people who oppose fascism are “socialists and Marxists . . . are not Democrats.”  Ms. Pelosi would do well to remember that large numbers of San Franciscans - her constituents - are socialists and/or Marxists and are also registered Democrats who vote.